
Latest News
Tecumseh reduce costs while enhancing quality with systematic materials selection
New data module mitigates critical materials risk through material intelligence
On the blog
Unappreciated materials: Corrugated iron
Events
May 21-24, SIMULIA Community Conference (Vienna, Austria)
May 21, Using CES Selector with GRANTA MI (webinar)
May 22, Meeting materials challenges for wind turbines (webinar, guest speaker from Vestas)
May 23, Supporting accreditation criteria for engineering programs (webinar, guest speaker from University of North Florida)
May 28, Manipulating properties: material and process trajectories on property charts (webinar, guest speaker from Cambridge University)

Cambridge, UK—April 25, 2012
Materials Selection for Aerospace Systems—new NASA/TM report
A recent NASA Technical Memorandum addresses the opportunities arising from systematic materials selection for aerospace systems. Taking the examples of engine blades and pressure vessels (both at room temperature and elevated temperature, where time-dependent effects are important) this paper demonstrates a systematic, design-oriented, five-step approach to materials selection:
- establishing design requirements,
- material screening,
- ranking,
- researching specific candidates, and
- applying specific organizational constraints to the selection process.
The pivotal stage is the definition of performance indices (i.e., particular combinations of material properties that embody the performance of a given component), allowing the use of powerful graphical selection charts to make trade-offs between conflicting objectives.

A material property chart showing modulus-density space, with contours of specific modulus, E/ρ. Part of the space is occupied by materials, part it empty (the “holes”). Material development that extended the occupied territory in the direction of the arrow (the “vector for material development”) allows components with greater stiffness-to-weight than is at present possible.
These graphs of material property space also reveal ‘holes’ in the property combinations available with conventional materials, which can be addressed through engineered/hybrid materials, enabling innovation and increases in performance as compared to monolithic materials. An example of this is shown above, taken from Fig. 28 of the paper, indicating the desired areas for material development, and providing a means to assess the merit of new engineered and hybrid materials.
The report concludes with a brief discussion on managing the data needed for materials selection, including collection, analysis, deployment, and maintenance issues.
‘Materials Selection for Aerospace Systems’, by Steven Arnold, of the NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and David Cebon and Mike Ashby, of Cambridge University and Granta Design, is available on the NASA Technical Reports Server as paper 2012-217411
